I'm seeing this amidst a lot of pundit complaints that the FDA and similar regulatory organizations are hopelessly restrictionist. Because of their incentives, because they only add new regulations and never remove old and ill-suited ones, etc.
I'm not saying the pundits are wrong in general, but this seems to be an exception. What went right here and why? Is there anything to learn?
I'm not saying the pundits are wrong in general, but this seems to be an exception. What went right here and why? Is there anything to learn?