Comment

Comment by column

See, that's a long article I would have just skipped a year ago. Now, we get to play with its content and it's fun :

Joe: So, it was late 2019 when we stumbled upon the breach at the think tank.

Donald: And what did you find, Joe?

Joe: Another digital security breach, nothing special. But then we found a second group of hackers, more skilled, going after specific executives, policy wonks, and IT staff.

Donald: Damn, that's some precision targeting right there.

Joe: Yeah, we kicked them out, but they kept coming back. We found out they had planted a backdoor three years earlier, and we never even knew.

Donald: Three years?! They were playing the long game, huh?

Joe: You could say that. And in June 2020, they came back. We spent days trying to figure out how they slipped in.

Donald: And how did they do it?

Joe: They zeroed in on a server running SolarWinds software. And that's when the Department of Justice called us.

Donald: Those hackers were clever.

Joe: You're damn right they were. They had gained access to the firm’s multifactor authentication system and were conducting counterintelligence against one of their biggest foes.

Donald: Who was that?

Joe: Mandiant.

Donald: And did Mandiant catch them?

Joe: Yeah, they did. But here's the thing, Don. Mandiant had investigated an intrusion on a server running the same SolarWinds software months earlier.

Donald: No way.

Joe: Yeah, way. And they didn't recognize the similarity between the two cases.

Donald: Why not?

Joe: Internal secrecy, man. And SolarWinds was the source of the hack.

Donald: That's what caused all the anger, huh?

Joe: You got it. And the US government won't say what the hackers did inside its networks. People are saying they don't want to admit their failures.

parent column 3 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton