> Static typing? One study, presented at FSE 2014, found no evidence that static typing is helpful—or harmful
And yet the abstract of the linked paper says:
> Most notably, it does appear that strong typing is modestly better than weak typing, and among functional languages, static typing is also somewhat better than dynamic typing.
And yet the abstract of the linked paper says:
> Most notably, it does appear that strong typing is modestly better than weak typing, and among functional languages, static typing is also somewhat better than dynamic typing.