The entire process whereby laws are drafted and enforced is alarming. Lobbyists and people who disagree with your way of life have substantial influence. I believe that for some of the largest expenditures of my lifetime the US Congress voted literally without people having read the final text bills they were voting on [0]. The language is interpreted by a large group of unreliable judges and juries. Corruption hangs in the air, and people who talk rationally are thin in the conversation. Lord of the Flies looms large in everyone's minds.
Using AI in the drafting process is hardly something to get worked up about in amongst that mess. ChatGPT has a nice clear style and will probably help make these laws more accessible.
ChatGPT can read a 4,000 page bill in 3 days. It'll probably be a net win once the dust settles if it makes it harder to ram stuff through without debate. And it'll be a nice neutral way of arguing about what is in a bill - people might be able to agree on which AI is reasonable and what it thinks the summary should be. That'd be a win the size of the moon in terms of better pressure to write good legislation.
Using AI in the drafting process is hardly something to get worked up about in amongst that mess. ChatGPT has a nice clear style and will probably help make these laws more accessible.
ChatGPT can read a 4,000 page bill in 3 days. It'll probably be a net win once the dust settles if it makes it harder to ram stuff through without debate. And it'll be a nice neutral way of arguing about what is in a bill - people might be able to agree on which AI is reasonable and what it thinks the summary should be. That'd be a win the size of the moon in terms of better pressure to write good legislation.
[0] https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-64069764