I was really hoping that he would have presented an argument for why we shouldn't be worried about massive unemployment, but he didn't. All he did was point to a prior era, at something that is very different from AI, and say "look, that didn't cause massive unemployment!"
Such apples-and-oranges comparisons are not reassuring.
I keep actively looking for why this concern shouldn't be concerning and coming up empty.
Such apples-and-oranges comparisons are not reassuring.
I keep actively looking for why this concern shouldn't be concerning and coming up empty.