I've skimmed his argument and it boils down to "I have a hypothesis explaining this phenomenon and you don't."
It doesn't address anything I've asserted. I can think of several possibilities off the cuff but that's not likely to go good places.
Everything I know about human psychology says "Contrary to popular opinion, family life is much more formative and influential for legal minors than their peer group."
Edit:
I will add that where their peer group is a very strong influence it's because the family has already failed them.
It doesn't address anything I've asserted. I can think of several possibilities off the cuff but that's not likely to go good places.
Everything I know about human psychology says "Contrary to popular opinion, family life is much more formative and influential for legal minors than their peer group."
Edit:
I will add that where their peer group is a very strong influence it's because the family has already failed them.