Unchecked Censorship by the government can be a problem, but I find it hard to take voices in this space on face value since they are often the most vocal cheerleaders when a government or political party they like is doing the censorship since it's "Human rights" not politics.
Given the dissolving line between Social media and the Town square, who should be the arbiters of speech on Social media?
A committee appointed from "Interest groups" with all the right "credentials" and "expertise"? Effectively an incestous group with circular pats on the backs.
A separate body elected by the people just for this purpose?
Given the dissolving line between Social media and the Town square, who should be the arbiters of speech on Social media?
A committee appointed from "Interest groups" with all the right "credentials" and "expertise"? Effectively an incestous group with circular pats on the backs.
A separate body elected by the people just for this purpose?
Something else?