It's probably the only source at all, as every number in the sammobile article is also in the NYT, like the 160+ people working on Magi.
As the sammobile article doesn't appear to do anything but regurgitate what is in the NYT article without any apparent validation on their side, the link should be changed to the NYT IMO, whose article seems at least based on actual internal messages from Google. I understand that the title isn't as attention grabbing though ("Google Devising Radical Search Changes to Beat Back A.I. Rivals").
The only source linked in the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/16/technology/google-search-...
It's probably the only source at all, as every number in the sammobile article is also in the NYT, like the 160+ people working on Magi.
As the sammobile article doesn't appear to do anything but regurgitate what is in the NYT article without any apparent validation on their side, the link should be changed to the NYT IMO, whose article seems at least based on actual internal messages from Google. I understand that the title isn't as attention grabbing though ("Google Devising Radical Search Changes to Beat Back A.I. Rivals").