5. then the AI judge says "AI provides logical consistency and use of evidence" despite citing no sources and just brushing aside my counter arguments by saying I'm wrong and repeating its arguments.
Ultimately it wasn't all that different than regular GPT. Is it even possible for the AI judge to say that the user wins?
2. It throws multiple arguments at you
3. Then it stops the debate after a certain point
4. It repeats its arguments
5. then the AI judge says "AI provides logical consistency and use of evidence" despite citing no sources and just brushing aside my counter arguments by saying I'm wrong and repeating its arguments.
Ultimately it wasn't all that different than regular GPT. Is it even possible for the AI judge to say that the user wins?