I am an atheist, but I thought Dawkin's book, the god delusion, came across frankly as ignorant.
There are whole canons of theological thought which counter many of his arguments, as theologians raised those concerns ages ago and have been thinking about them for literally thousands of years.
I think maybe he served a role though. An unreasonable voice can still be a valuable one, however much I might dislike that fact
There are whole canons of theological thought which counter many of his arguments, as theologians raised those concerns ages ago and have been thinking about them for literally thousands of years.
I think maybe he served a role though. An unreasonable voice can still be a valuable one, however much I might dislike that fact