Yeah, that seems like a weird rule to have. If anything, I’d want engineers to be excited about languages, tools and paradigms, even if they weren’t exact fits with the current stacks we’re using.
The whole article’s point is that these change, anyway. So those people they’re rejecting on this silly rule might eventually become the people they crave if functional programming becomes cool again at Culture Amp in 5 years.
The whole article’s point is that these change, anyway. So those people they’re rejecting on this silly rule might eventually become the people they crave if functional programming becomes cool again at Culture Amp in 5 years.