Comment by zaroth

These are more like hit pieces by advocacy groups that are against all forms of animal testing.

The Vox article for example was written by the partner of someone who worked at PCRM - the advocacy group that filed the complaint.

The article is also packed with pictures of animal abuse that has absolutely nothing to do with Neuralink - which they do mentioned in the fine print.

These images of course are entirely misleading and have no place in the article other than trying to draw a false equivalence.