Both can be true at the same time. I see it likely that:
1. Superintelligent AGI seems inevitable, even if it takes thousands of years. So fighting against it requires destroying all progress and freedom.
2. But if it comes we are no longer the dominant species; we'll have as much control as big animals do now. If that isn't essentially being destroyed, it's close enough.
1. Superintelligent AGI seems inevitable, even if it takes thousands of years. So fighting against it requires destroying all progress and freedom.
2. But if it comes we are no longer the dominant species; we'll have as much control as big animals do now. If that isn't essentially being destroyed, it's close enough.