> It turns out the last 10% takes 90% of the time/effort.
It turns out that consumer protection around these "new technologies" is basically non-existent, allowing corporations to charge people for fantastic sounding ideas that they know for a fact are not and are not going to be practical within the lifespan of the item they just sold you.
> I think GPT-4 was enough of a leap over GPT3.5
Compared to what, though? The cost of training? The cost of running the model? The accuracy of output? The increase in real world utility?
It turns out that consumer protection around these "new technologies" is basically non-existent, allowing corporations to charge people for fantastic sounding ideas that they know for a fact are not and are not going to be practical within the lifespan of the item they just sold you.
> I think GPT-4 was enough of a leap over GPT3.5
Compared to what, though? The cost of training? The cost of running the model? The accuracy of output? The increase in real world utility?
It's the "Wild West Snake Oil" period of AI.