It's not much easier to engage with ten articles of varying quality and varying levels of disagreement than with a podcast.
>The Miseducation of Free Speech
Does not focus on Haidt.
>College and the “Culture War”: Assessing Higher Education’s Influence on Moral Attitudes
Does not focus on Haidt.
>The Myth of the Campus Coddle Crisis
"This is not one of those laudatory reviews. Although I agree with many things they write, and share their general outlook in opposition to safetyism (protecting people from any possible harms, including offensive ideas) and in favor of free speech, I want to focus on my disagreements because dissent is more interesting and more important."
Dissents on specific political implications while agreeing with the wider point.
>What 'Safe Spaces' really look like on college campuses
Does not mention Haidt at all; focuses mostly on "safe spaces" in the narrow sense of support groups.
>Are College Campuses Really in the Thrall of Leftist Censors?
Tabloid piece; focuses primarily on political bias and not overall censorship; does not mention Haidt.
>Speaking Freely: What Students Think about Expression at American Colleges
From FIRE, whose leadership worked with Haidt on the book; presumably not that critical of Haidt. Skipped.
>Not all cultures are created equal’ says Penn Law professor in op-ed
Focuses on Amy Waxman, an infamously racist professor whom even "anti-woke" firebrand Norman Finkelstein has denounced. A bit of a strawman.
>Right Wing Media Has Tried to Stifle Student Speech at Evergreen State College
Does not focus on Haidt; essentially agrees by highlighting censorship on college campuses, but disputes whether it is primarily leftist.
>I'm a liberal professor, and my liberal students terrify me
Skipped. You know why.
>In College and Hiding from Scary Ideas
Paywall; title indicates that it agrees with Haidt.
Nowhere in this Gish gallop of links is there a serious critique of the analysis in The Coddling of the American Mind, except in the third link, where the author is explicitly saying he agrees with Haidt on most points. Using this to discredit Haidt as he discusses a completely different subject is not a very helpful contribution to the overall discussion.
>The Miseducation of Free Speech
Does not focus on Haidt.
>College and the “Culture War”: Assessing Higher Education’s Influence on Moral Attitudes
Does not focus on Haidt.
>The Myth of the Campus Coddle Crisis
"This is not one of those laudatory reviews. Although I agree with many things they write, and share their general outlook in opposition to safetyism (protecting people from any possible harms, including offensive ideas) and in favor of free speech, I want to focus on my disagreements because dissent is more interesting and more important."
Dissents on specific political implications while agreeing with the wider point.
>What 'Safe Spaces' really look like on college campuses
Does not mention Haidt at all; focuses mostly on "safe spaces" in the narrow sense of support groups.
>Are College Campuses Really in the Thrall of Leftist Censors?
Tabloid piece; focuses primarily on political bias and not overall censorship; does not mention Haidt.
>Speaking Freely: What Students Think about Expression at American Colleges
From FIRE, whose leadership worked with Haidt on the book; presumably not that critical of Haidt. Skipped.
>Not all cultures are created equal’ says Penn Law professor in op-ed
Focuses on Amy Waxman, an infamously racist professor whom even "anti-woke" firebrand Norman Finkelstein has denounced. A bit of a strawman.
>Right Wing Media Has Tried to Stifle Student Speech at Evergreen State College
Does not focus on Haidt; essentially agrees by highlighting censorship on college campuses, but disputes whether it is primarily leftist.
>I'm a liberal professor, and my liberal students terrify me
Skipped. You know why.
>In College and Hiding from Scary Ideas
Paywall; title indicates that it agrees with Haidt.
Nowhere in this Gish gallop of links is there a serious critique of the analysis in The Coddling of the American Mind, except in the third link, where the author is explicitly saying he agrees with Haidt on most points. Using this to discredit Haidt as he discusses a completely different subject is not a very helpful contribution to the overall discussion.