I think you're misrepresenting the text a bit. It says:
> What’s interesting about solving such a case is how it relies on concepts that may seem counterintuitive to forensic biologists but are quite straightforward to an electronics engineer.
They're only claiming it's "counterintuitive" to biologists trained in other methods.
> What’s interesting about solving such a case is how it relies on concepts that may seem counterintuitive to forensic biologists but are quite straightforward to an electronics engineer.
They're only claiming it's "counterintuitive" to biologists trained in other methods.