This study's method does not properly assess the article's claim. OP's first statement is correct, the latter wasn't necessary, but I wouldn't call it misogynist.
The study isn't really the issue here. It's only titled "Women in the workplace", and includes statistics.
The article takes incredibly large leaps of logic to push a narrative.
Garbage like this shouldn't be allowed, and really isn't a good look for MIT Sloan.
The study isn't really the issue here. It's only titled "Women in the workplace", and includes statistics.
The article takes incredibly large leaps of logic to push a narrative.
Garbage like this shouldn't be allowed, and really isn't a good look for MIT Sloan.