The run they were tweeting about was a wider one on all regional banks. Did not happen at time of their tweets, they were speculating about the future.
Why was it the VCs impacted by the SVB collapse, and not the wider banking world, who stood to lose more, who were loudest to make that claim?
Why was it the VCs impacted by the SVB collapse, and not the wider banking world, who stood to lose more, who were loudest to make that claim?