Why do people like him think copyright laws are bad and made by rich people, but also support open source software, which relies on the same copyright laws to exist.
If hes an anarchist then fine, but it looks like he wants laws that benefit him and not people that actually write software.
I read the whole thing and I still don't know why he did it. He says there was no money incentive and his work had no impact on piracy. What was its purpose then?
If hes an anarchist then fine, but it looks like he wants laws that benefit him and not people that actually write software.
I read the whole thing and I still don't know why he did it. He says there was no money incentive and his work had no impact on piracy. What was its purpose then?