I always thought about it as thinking like an oak tree.
A 100 year oak tree probably "knows" more "things" than I do, but there's almost no common language by which we could communicate.
And that's with another biological entity! The chasm would be even wider with fully synthetic life, absent an intentional recreation of our methods of perception.
A 100 year oak tree probably "knows" more "things" than I do, but there's almost no common language by which we could communicate.
And that's with another biological entity! The chasm would be even wider with fully synthetic life, absent an intentional recreation of our methods of perception.