Why the need to bring it under control? Control from what?
It's not the AI that's the issue, it's the use of it that's the problem.
The law shouldn't focus on the AI, for example:
>The regulation, proposed by the Commission in 2021, was designed to ban some AI applications like social scoring
Ban social scoring, not the AI, the tool doesn't matter. Would it be good if it was computed by hand on paper instead of through AI? No, so the issue is not the tool.
They fear the amplification factor of such tech, but the amplification factor works for the good and for the bad, so you need to focus just on the bad, not on the tech. Otherwise you end up impairing the good too.
It's not the AI that's the issue, it's the use of it that's the problem. The law shouldn't focus on the AI, for example:
>The regulation, proposed by the Commission in 2021, was designed to ban some AI applications like social scoring
Ban social scoring, not the AI, the tool doesn't matter. Would it be good if it was computed by hand on paper instead of through AI? No, so the issue is not the tool.
They fear the amplification factor of such tech, but the amplification factor works for the good and for the bad, so you need to focus just on the bad, not on the tech. Otherwise you end up impairing the good too.