> "Allowed" is a telling choice of words though! You're advocating for a state-enforced limit on what people are allowed to choose for themselves.
To children. What people are allowed to do to children
> Which is why the permission of their parents acts as a limit on what they're able to agree to, in this case as in all others.
If a parent comes forward and says "I consent to my child getting sterilized", should that be the only criterion necessary? You said "all" here, so you think that the case I provided is also covered?
> The anti-trans moral panic is the tip of the spear of fascism in north america
To children. What people are allowed to do to children
> Which is why the permission of their parents acts as a limit on what they're able to agree to, in this case as in all others.
If a parent comes forward and says "I consent to my child getting sterilized", should that be the only criterion necessary? You said "all" here, so you think that the case I provided is also covered?
> The anti-trans moral panic is the tip of the spear of fascism in north america
https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/02/16/as-spain-advances-t...
Would you describe Sweden as a fascist country? For (generally) prohibiting giving hormonal therapies to children?