> And it pretty much worked! Using prompts to find matches is not really ideal, but we want to use GPT's semantic understanding. That's where Embeddings come in.
sounds like you ended up not using GPT3 in the end which is probably wise.
i'm curious if you might see further savings using other cheaper embeddings that are available on huggingface. but its probably not material at this point.
sounds like you ended up not using GPT3 in the end which is probably wise.
i'm curious if you might see further savings using other cheaper embeddings that are available on huggingface. but its probably not material at this point.
did you also consider using pgvector instead of pinecone? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34684593 any painpoints with pinecone you can recall?