Comment

Comment by fancyremarker

It's possible for a PaaS to improve your security posture by implementing many of the security controls you'd otherwise be responsible for yourself. Every PaaS provider has a Shared Responsibility Model, like this one from AWS [0], and a good PaaS can eat up much of what would otherwise be your responsibility as an AWS customer: network architecture, secure configuration, IAM, system access (and auditing), intrusion detection, etc.

On the other hand, many PaaS providers obfuscate their security implementation, and ultimately your data could be compromised by their mistakes. Things you should look for when evaluating PaaS providers:

- How are resources, networks, etc. separated/isolated per customer?

- What are YOUR security responsibilities on the platform?

- How transparent is the provider about their security controls? Do they have security whitepapers, SOC 2 reports, etc. that are transparent and legit? Better yet, can they prove to you in the product how security controls are being implemented?

Disclaimer: I'm the CEO and founder of Aptible [1], a PaaS specifically built to meet and prove security requirements for companies in regulated/high-compliance environments.

[0] https://aws.amazon.com/compliance/shared-responsibility-mode...

[1] https://www.aptible.com/

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton