It's not just that it causes cancer, but it's that improper storage (heat exposure) increases the risk of it causing cancer, and when informed of that, GSK decided it was not worth doing anything about it.
> GSK's leadership was warned on several occasions about the storage issue, but it opted against making any changes to existing plans.
In a way, this makes it worse, because they could have taken action to limit the risk to people, but chose not to, presumably to save money or to avoid bad publicity.
> GSK's leadership was warned on several occasions about the storage issue, but it opted against making any changes to existing plans.
In a way, this makes it worse, because they could have taken action to limit the risk to people, but chose not to, presumably to save money or to avoid bad publicity.