> And in the event of a potential UA victory the use of tactical nuclear weapons from RU seem likely
The consensus military opinion I've read on this is that tactical nukes aren't very useful militarily; troops in the field are too dispersed. If there's a hardened target, then yes, otherwise not great.
They then have to be weighed against the costs of crossing that Rubicon.
> why they're suddenly so worried about these spy drones
I think this is largely because of opposition screeching.
The consensus military opinion I've read on this is that tactical nukes aren't very useful militarily; troops in the field are too dispersed. If there's a hardened target, then yes, otherwise not great.
They then have to be weighed against the costs of crossing that Rubicon.
> why they're suddenly so worried about these spy drones
I think this is largely because of opposition screeching.