They exhibit all the characteristics of bokeh and sensor glare, and it’s speculation that they are anything else.
As for instrument measurements, the track that turns out to be a bird is identified as such mainly by simply correctly interpreting the instrument data.
So we’re back the square one. All the ‘smoking gun’ evidence turns out to be a damp squib and now we’re just expected to believe unrecorded ‘radar measurements’ and eye witness accounts.
As for instrument measurements, the track that turns out to be a bird is identified as such mainly by simply correctly interpreting the instrument data.
So we’re back the square one. All the ‘smoking gun’ evidence turns out to be a damp squib and now we’re just expected to believe unrecorded ‘radar measurements’ and eye witness accounts.