> It is basically like having an incredibly smart engineer/scientists/philosopher/etc that can explain things quite well, but for pretty much every field.
No. You've fallen for exactly the con the article is describing.
ChatGPT knows nothing. It is very good at generating text that seems plausible if you know nothing about the subject matter, but is not reliable as an actual source of information.
If you happened to get information from it that turned out to be ok, you were lucky. Don't expect your luck to last.
No. You've fallen for exactly the con the article is describing.
ChatGPT knows nothing. It is very good at generating text that seems plausible if you know nothing about the subject matter, but is not reliable as an actual source of information.
If you happened to get information from it that turned out to be ok, you were lucky. Don't expect your luck to last.