> So Ubuntu offering some support where RH offers no support is worse?
Which is worse: putting asbestos in everything because you don't know it's harmful yet, or once everyone learns that it is harmful, having a cheap product line that you put asbestos in and an expensive product line that you don't?
Which is worse: putting asbestos in everything because you don't know it's harmful yet, or once everyone learns that it is harmful, having a cheap product line that you put asbestos in and an expensive product line that you don't?