Comment

Comment by AmericanChopper

> HIT (High intensity training, what is discussed in the article) training achieves the same effects as much longer endurance training at much shorter times

Certainly not the same effect. HIT training doesn’t improve respiratory or cardiovascular fitness as effectively as continuous training does, and it doesn’t condition the muscles for endurance as effectively as continuous training does either.

I don’t know much about cycling, but I know a lot about endurance running, and the typical training regime will utilise continuous training (such as long runs, recovery runs…), as well as high intensity training and some training that’s a mixture of both, like fartleks. The reason being they all produce different results, and you want the benefit of all of them.

Here’s a video made by Eliud Kipchoge‘s athletics team that talks about the benefit of long runs:

https://youtu.be/CeN1FeJIygQ

They have other videos about the other training intensities they use as well. Their training facility is also at a rather high altitude, which is basically its own form of training as well, or a legal form of blood doping, depending on how you look at it.

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton