Comment

Comment by marojejian

Having read the book:Pro:It's a great question and mission.I'm sympathetic to their general critiques and main points e.g.:

- prehistoric human were just as smart and creative as us

- there's a ton to learn from them.

- there is not enough evidence to accept an inevitable path to a state with ever growing power.

- prehistoric people tried a bunch of different societal types we can hardly conceive of.

- We should strive to be as experimental and playful.

- There is interesting new evidence in there (e.g. about potentially non-authoritarian per-historic societies)

Con:

- Evidence / word ratio very low

- Authors have a HUGE Ax to grind. even if I like some portion of that axe, I can't afford to trust them, they are more biased than the folks they attack (not that I like Yuval Harari so much either...)

- Poor reasoning processes: 1)X is conceivable 2) Y might be evidence of X, 3) (Much later) As we demonstrated: X is True

- Super repetitive

So net, I'd say read a few reviews (e.g. Tides of History) and skip the actual book, and hope we can find some better avatars for this mission. Go listen to some Mike Duncan podcasts.

parent marojejian 3 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton