The "the only product known to have embedded unobfuscated Measurement Systems malware" phrase got used a whole lot, in the OP and in comments here as well as in the original email thread, but nobody really explained why that factor was important (or maybe I just missed it?)
Can somebody explain the significance of the malware being unobfuscated, and why that's apparently more concerning than if it had been obfuscated?
Can somebody explain the significance of the malware being unobfuscated, and why that's apparently more concerning than if it had been obfuscated?