> AI: Answer that's clearly factually wrong (e.g. a function that doesn't exist or a completely wrong numerical figure).
> Me: that's not right, the function doesn't exist (etc.)
> AI: you are right, that function doesn't exist. The answer is blah
And repeat, since if it didn't get it right first time, it seems unlikely to be able to get there at all (and you'd not know when it did unless you already know the answer).
It's very like a specific person I know in a PR-marketing type job that will just glide across a noticed outright falsehood and instantly reshape what they're saying in real time and carry on as if nothing happened, leaving you wondering if you're taking crazy pills.
> AI: Answer that's clearly factually wrong (e.g. a function that doesn't exist or a completely wrong numerical figure).
> Me: that's not right, the function doesn't exist (etc.)
> AI: you are right, that function doesn't exist. The answer is blah
And repeat, since if it didn't get it right first time, it seems unlikely to be able to get there at all (and you'd not know when it did unless you already know the answer).
It's very like a specific person I know in a PR-marketing type job that will just glide across a noticed outright falsehood and instantly reshape what they're saying in real time and carry on as if nothing happened, leaving you wondering if you're taking crazy pills.