Despite errors in the statements made by the LLMs, I'm a huge fan of this syntax which has inline references. Seem like a great bridge between LLMs being "statistical babble" and a useful knowledge-retrieval tool.
Curious whether the references themselves could be wrong? Or how they would be generated to (for example) prioritize primary sources over secondary sources.
Curious whether the references themselves could be wrong? Or how they would be generated to (for example) prioritize primary sources over secondary sources.