The question the editors should be asking of their peer reviewers is: why was neither this, nor any of the other glaring errors spotted during the process of peer review, a process literally designed to catch things such as this?
This is why I think that peer reviewers should be deanonymized post-review, to allow for accountability and open conflict-of-interest investigations.
This is why I think that peer reviewers should be deanonymized post-review, to allow for accountability and open conflict-of-interest investigations.