> age verification for any website that contains 33.3 percent or more pornographic material (a digression: we're seeing a strong opportunity here for sites featuring only 33.2 percent pornographic material).
So what they can just add a bunch of free content that isn't porn and get away with it? Seems like a poorly thought-out law.
So what they can just add a bunch of free content that isn't porn and get away with it? Seems like a poorly thought-out law.