> these are the kind of points peer reviewers would raise (though typically in far more esoteric and passive aggressive ways...)
If you don't mind me asking, how do you deal with this kind of culture, where a normal process is being purposefully obstructed with such behavior from the reviewer?
Do you ever call people out who sprinkle their "reviews" with such passive aggression? What is their defense? What highlights does your profession have that make it worth putting up with this?
If you don't mind me asking, how do you deal with this kind of culture, where a normal process is being purposefully obstructed with such behavior from the reviewer?
Do you ever call people out who sprinkle their "reviews" with such passive aggression? What is their defense? What highlights does your profession have that make it worth putting up with this?