> The main criteria for research work are "new, correct, and significant". Do well on all three of these and have NO PROBLEMS getting reviewed and published.
So, I said that have to "do well".
So your
> You couldn't be more wrong.
is a bit strong.
I've published maybe a dozen papers, and I've never had a paper rejected or needing significant revision.
I've never been interested in publishing, and maybe the situation has changed a lot in the last few years while I've being doing other things.
Whatever, my original post to help CS profs get published was not wanted, and I've deleted it. The CS profs can struggle on their own.
> The main criteria for research work are "new, correct, and significant". Do well on all three of these and have NO PROBLEMS getting reviewed and published.
So, I said that have to "do well".
So your
> You couldn't be more wrong.
is a bit strong.
I've published maybe a dozen papers, and I've never had a paper rejected or needing significant revision.
I've never been interested in publishing, and maybe the situation has changed a lot in the last few years while I've being doing other things.
Whatever, my original post to help CS profs get published was not wanted, and I've deleted it. The CS profs can struggle on their own.