That seems to be about transitioning to an open-source model. I don't mean that. I mean simply having their git repo publicly accesible in a read-only fashion. No external contributions, no license, etc.
I see no reason not to do this, especially for such a security-oriented service. You should be striving for as much transparency as possible.
I see no reason not to do this, especially for such a security-oriented service. You should be striving for as much transparency as possible.