> One thing that’s a little disappointing: Ghost uses the MIT license, one of the most permissive OSS licenses there is. Essentially, anyone can do anything they want with our code, with ONE basic requirement: You must include copyright attribution. Which they have not.
For a SaaS app, wouldn't that copyright attribution be on the server side, where the code is (hidden from the end user)?
Is John stating he expects that copyright attribution to be in the "view source" of the HTML or some other user accessible location? What happens if that HTML/JS is minified/stripped/"compiled"?
IANAL: but I'm genuinely curious how this situation is handled.
For a SaaS app, wouldn't that copyright attribution be on the server side, where the code is (hidden from the end user)?
Is John stating he expects that copyright attribution to be in the "view source" of the HTML or some other user accessible location? What happens if that HTML/JS is minified/stripped/"compiled"?
IANAL: but I'm genuinely curious how this situation is handled.
https://twitter.com/JohnONolan/status/1602330414269472769