I disagree with this comment, and anyone reading it should take it with a big grain of salt. Let's go back to 2016 and replace "LLM" with "Reinforcement Learning". Everyone thought every problem could be solve by RL because it's a looser restriction on the problem space. But then RL failed to deliver real world benefits beyond some very specific circumstances (well defined games), and supervised learning is/was still king for 99% of problems.
Yes, LLMs are amazing but they won't be winning every single Kaggle competition, displacing every other ML algorithms in every setting.
Yes, LLMs are amazing but they won't be winning every single Kaggle competition, displacing every other ML algorithms in every setting.