so zero dollars were spent adding null safety to languages? False.
Zero dollars were spent converting code to those languages? False.
Zero dollars were spent solving problems uniquely created by not having the benefits of null? Also false.
> I'd take his expert opinion and experience on the matter over anybody referring to him as "a dude with a fancy name".
Sounds like a crappy way to reason about facts. Just because he did cool shit once upon a time doesn’t mean that we should believe him when he pulls numbers out of his ass.
so zero dollars were spent adding null safety to languages? False.
Zero dollars were spent converting code to those languages? False.
Zero dollars were spent solving problems uniquely created by not having the benefits of null? Also false.
> I'd take his expert opinion and experience on the matter over anybody referring to him as "a dude with a fancy name".
Sounds like a crappy way to reason about facts. Just because he did cool shit once upon a time doesn’t mean that we should believe him when he pulls numbers out of his ass.