I think this is completely irrelevant given the much more pertinent example given:
> Or, to give an example from the article — houses that are eligible for government guarantees (those below $750K-$1M) have appreciated similar amounts in the past decade to those that's aren't eligible.
> Or, to give an example from the article — houses that are eligible for government guarantees (those below $750K-$1M) have appreciated similar amounts in the past decade to those that's aren't eligible.