Comment

Comment by exDM69

I work as a software developer in a hardware company. We have A LOT of tests.

But testing costs a lot more when there is hardware present. It's a whole new dimension in your testing matrix. You can't run on cloud provider CI. Hardware has failures, someone needs to be there to reboot the systems and swap out broken ones (and thing break when they run hot 24/7). And you need some way to test whether the hardware did what it is supposed to do.

Although some kernel driver developers have testing clusters with real hardware (like GPU drivers devs), there is no effin way Linux could be effectively tested without someone paying a lot of money to set up real hardware and people to keep it running.

Of course the hardware can be simulated but simulation and emulation are slow (and potentially expensive). At work we run tests on simulation for next gen hardware which doesn't exist yet. It is about 100,000x slower than the real deal, so it's obviously not a solution that scales up.

Testing purely software products without a hardware dimension is so much simpler and cheaper.

parent exDM69 4 years ago

Discussion

Live from the official Hacker News API

A modern reader for Hacker News · SvelteKit + Skeleton