>I do not see where he did that. He argued simply that context matters. (And yes a "bad" tool can be the right tool, if it is the only tool avaiable.)
Well I see it. If you don't see it, I urge you to reread what he said.
A bad tool can be the right tool but some tools are so bad that it is never the right tool.
>And diving deeper into philosophy here, can you name one example?
Running is better then walking for short distances when optimizing for shorter time. In this case walking is definitively "bad." No argument by anyone.
Please don't take this into a pedantic segway with your counter here.
Well I see it. If you don't see it, I urge you to reread what he said.
A bad tool can be the right tool but some tools are so bad that it is never the right tool.
>And diving deeper into philosophy here, can you name one example?
Running is better then walking for short distances when optimizing for shorter time. In this case walking is definitively "bad." No argument by anyone.
Please don't take this into a pedantic segway with your counter here.