I just started a small hobby project and selected supabase for my db provider. Anyone with experience in both Supa and PlanetScale care to comment about the differences?
To me, it looks like supabase is designed to take full advantage of postgres features. plpgsql triggers + RLS + clientside auth + streaming changes to subscribers (including via web hooks) are my favorite features. (They also have js edge functions, but I use lambda instead b/c I prefer python)
Supabase feels like the scrappy company with amazing focus, akin to an early MailChimp (circa 2007). PlanetBase feels more like early Snowflake - massive scale, focus on performance, can match anything feature-by-feature. One is a master of their craft, the other is a gorilla at scale.
Curious what others think. I haven't used PlanetBase extensively so don't have much to go on except their marketing.
To me, it looks like supabase is designed to take full advantage of postgres features. plpgsql triggers + RLS + clientside auth + streaming changes to subscribers (including via web hooks) are my favorite features. (They also have js edge functions, but I use lambda instead b/c I prefer python)
Supabase feels like the scrappy company with amazing focus, akin to an early MailChimp (circa 2007). PlanetBase feels more like early Snowflake - massive scale, focus on performance, can match anything feature-by-feature. One is a master of their craft, the other is a gorilla at scale.
Curious what others think. I haven't used PlanetBase extensively so don't have much to go on except their marketing.