Comment by sqeaky

> A large number of pornographic audios publicly available on the Internet seriously threaten the mental and physical health of children

First sentence. This is either a great humanitarian scouring for the victims of child porn. Or it is a useless puritanical crusade against porn.

I started reading the paper and this is just about porn filtering, pretty much useless perhaps even harmful.

I am sure using CNNs to do this is innovative, but if you are going to start from a lie why should I trust your research?