> The way this works today, a person is competence at raising children is untill social services prove otherwise. Kinda like innocent until proved guilty.
Nobody is talking about 16 year olds or abortions. Are you sure you’re not deliberately changing the topic and really are debating in good faith?
Why do you believe it’s appropriate to compare a random 16 year old with a convicted criminal, who is awaiting sentencing?
> a person is competence at raising children is untill social services prove otherwise. Kinda like innocent until proved guilty
And no one is arguing against that. You’re making a straw man argument.
Nobody is talking about 16 year olds or abortions. Are you sure you’re not deliberately changing the topic and really are debating in good faith?
Why do you believe it’s appropriate to compare a random 16 year old with a convicted criminal, who is awaiting sentencing?
> a person is competence at raising children is untill social services prove otherwise. Kinda like innocent until proved guilty
And no one is arguing against that. You’re making a straw man argument.