This seems a rather passionately biased take on the - undoubtedly very controversial - constitutional moment, that seems determined to push "blame" onto the late Queen. The title is absurd clickbait.
Reading into the background in less partial news articles it seems that the Royal team were rightly answering the GG's questions in his uncommonly frequent letters and stressing the action should be a last resort.
If the guy was a bad choice, that's ultimately on the Prime Minister who selected him, the one he dismissed...
Reading into the background in less partial news articles it seems that the Royal team were rightly answering the GG's questions in his uncommonly frequent letters and stressing the action should be a last resort.
If the guy was a bad choice, that's ultimately on the Prime Minister who selected him, the one he dismissed...