I can't say I agree with that logic. Would you say that any government official who advocated for the repeal of the 18th Amendment was violating their oath of office to defend the constitution?
It seems imperative that government officials need to be able to openly discuss the meaning of laws and whether those laws are appropriate without fear of punishment for that discussion.
It seems imperative that government officials need to be able to openly discuss the meaning of laws and whether those laws are appropriate without fear of punishment for that discussion.